What does the Olmstead decision require states to do for individuals with disabilities?

The Olmstead decision, which stemmed from a landmark Supreme Court ruling in 1999, mandates that states must provide individuals with disabilities the opportunity to live in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs. This reflects the principle that people with disabilities have the right to receive services in environments that are as close to those of individuals without disabilities as possible.

By requiring states to offer services in the most integrated setting, the decision supports the idea that individuals with disabilities should not be unnecessarily isolated or segregated from the community. This integration is crucial for promoting independence, community living, and full participation in society. The ruling aligns with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and emphasizes the importance of community-based living options.

In contrast, providing funding for rehabilitation programs does not specifically address the location or setting of services. Similarly, administering services in a segregated setting contradicts the essence of the Olmstead decision, which promotes integration rather than separation. While enhancing individual independence is a beneficial outcome of providing integrated services, it is not the primary requirement set forth by the Olmstead ruling.